81 Stuart J. Johnston, Microsoft Settles having Bit of Stac, Computerworld, June 27, 1994, at 30 (Microsoft paid $39.9 million for 155’o of Stac, and an additional $43 million over 43 months for a license to Stac’s data compression technology); Doug Barney, Microsoft, Stac Take care of Argument; Microsoft In the end Pays Upwards, InfoWorld, June 27, 1994, at 14.
83 As explained in Section V.C., infra, the superficially irrational behavior of undermining the application vendors that produce programs that run on Microsoft’s operating system is logical specifically once the Microsoft has an independent economic incentive to monopolize the s.
85 Amy Cortese, Business Week, Dec. 19, 1994, supra, at 35 (HP, Compaq and other big U.S. PC makers plan to bundle Windows 95 into their machines).
86 Discover Lawrence J. Microsoft: Not Wonderful, Bay Area Computer Currents, Dec. 1, 1994, at 98, 101 (Ex. 1); Carole Patton, Computerworld, Nov. 14, 1994, supra, at 57 (Ex. 8).
88 Don Clark, Microsoft to find Intuit Inside the Stock Treaty, Wall St. J., Oct. 14, 1994, at A3 (86% of retail store sales); Karen Epper, App Package Shakes Upwards Home Banking, Amer. Banker, Oct. 17, 1994, at 1, 25 (80-85%).
89 Michelle Flores, Wants Considerably more details, Seattle Times, Nov. 22, 1994, at B11; Michael Schrage, Microsoft Renders 1000s of dollars; Will it Profile the management of It?, Washington Post, Oct. 21, 1994, at B3; Brent Schlender, Fortune, Jan. 16, 1995, supra, at 36.
91 Brent Schendler, Fortune, Jan. 16, 1995, supra, at 4748; discover together with, Michael I. Miller, PC Magazine, Jan. 24, 1995, supra, at 80 (Ex. 25) (“Microsoft could require just a small service charge on each transaction. Or it could make money on the float — the interest in the few seconds it takes to move money from one place to another. Or both.”).
92 For example, leading industry analyst Rick Sherlund of Goldman Sachs predicted that with the settlement, Microsoft “should dominate the market for desktop software for the next 10 years.” And another leading analyst, Richard Shaffer concluded that “It]he operating system wars are over — Microsoft is the winner . Microsoft is the Standard Oil of its day.” Andrew Schulman, Microsoft’s Grip Into the Software Tightened up By Antitrust Bargain, Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools, Oct. 1994, at 143 (Ex. 13).
93 See John M. Goodman, This new 2 Heavyweights Wade Some other Bullet, InfoWorld, Aug. 29, 1994, at 87 (rating PC-DOS version 6.3 above MS-DOS version 6.22) and Earle Robinson, DOS-version Madness? Combination Coping with 2, Windows Sources, Oct. 1994, at 163 (“my choice would be the IBM . . . it’s cheaper”) and Yael Li-Ron, Desktop computer 2 six.3: Dos and 2: Broke up Within Beginning, PC-Computing, bra computers ship with MS-DOS).
Probe of Microsoft was Offered – Justice Dept
94 Don Clark Laurie Hays, Microsoft’s The fresh Income Projects Draw Complaints, Wall St. J., Dec. 12, 1994, at B6 (Ex. 41).
96 All of these problems are discussed http://datingranking.net/swapfinder-review/ in Rory O’Connor, San Jose Mercury News, Nov. 13, 1994, supra, at 1A, 28A (Ex. 34).
Magid
99 Indeed, Microsoft’s operating system “lock-in” has permitted it to bring demonstrably inferior products to market (products that did not enjoy any appreciable consumer acceptance) without negative consequences to the company. See Michael Morris, Microsoft Offer: A lack of, Far too late, S.F. Examiner, July 24, 1994, at C-5. (Ex. 33)
one hundred Joseph Farrell, Hunter K. Monroe and you may Garth Saloner, This new Straight Business Away from Business and you may Solutions Race Rather than Role Battle, Oct 1994 (performing papers).
101 Pick, e.g., supra, note 32. (Microsoft presently holds greater than 90% of the X86 operating system market share); Christopher O’Malley, Personal Computing, October 1986, supra, at 181, 183 (“Microsoft’s operating system” has “better than 95 percent” share of the X86 systems.)