And that i believed to your, you know I am hoping you will not subscribe to you to problem

And that i believed to your, you know I am hoping you will not subscribe to you to problem

Andrew Sharpless: – working with Bloomberg. And then I went away and I thought about a conversation I had had in Geneva with the Ambassador to the World Trade Organization, Mr. He listened to me very respectfully talk about how there were all kinds of measures of serious problems in the ocean.

And it also turned very clear in my experience the way the other areas of the work really work in tandem having a broader impression

And he basically said… i have a good million people in China to feed. The west might have been overfishing new oceans for some time. We will score our very own change. And i also leftover perception which i got very mishandled the new appointment. Here, I’d a contact that has been that we possess far more eating off a refreshing ocean. I got completely don’t build your just remember that , bring about the guy read me providing the sorts of old-fashioned conservation message which is an essential you to definitely however it is just no more than biodiversity cover.

You to definitely made me read, better, hold off one minute, we could size everything we are doing inside a scientific metric the dinner property value a rebuilt ocean, the food capital away from remodeled water. How many foods you may i feed from a beneficial remodeled sea? We named Bloomberg backup and i also said, hold off a minute, i have an alternate tip. And let’s speak about that it food, your meal metric.

Melissa Wright: You were able to bring back that epiphany and help develop what’s now a 3-country effort around overfishing. And I saw this work in action and in a recent trip to Brazil and was so impressed and inspired. And one of the side trips that we went on when I was in Brazil was to Itajai, and which I understand is one of the largest commercial fishing ports in Brazil.

Andrew Sharpless: They’re surprising big, aren’t they? I mean you – the audience should understand we’re not talking about like two guys in a little, you know, 15-foot skiff.

Melissa Wright: And Monica, the Brazilian rep from Oceana was telling me about how there was a lack of information, now, about what those boats are bringing in, which species, how much, when, and where they’ve been fishing because the country stopped monitoring their landings or their catch a few years ago. Can you speak to what impact that has had on the fisheries in Brazil and the work of Oceana?

Andrew Sharpless: So I’ve taken that same trip with you and it’s very impressive. The scale of our ability to catch ocean fish is enormous. And you see it as you go down that river and you’ll see these vessels that are stories and stories high – four or five or six stories high. So amazingly Brazil has collected no data on its own fisheries since 2008. Brazil’s had a kind of a budget crisis in that year. One of the ways they saved money was by cancelling all data collection efforts on fishery catches.

Wu

Thereby working together with, you know, all of our people around our company is today gathering landings studies inside an enthusiastic formal and reputable ways and you may revealing one to right up. And perhaps postorder brudens webbplatser they are now event investigation for the from the forty% of one’s full fishery connect.

Andrew Sharpless: Yeah. Which is a pretty basic step, we can all see how that starts to set the conditions for, you know, scientific and sensible management. We’ve just launched together with this little enterprise called Google, and Sky Truth, an NGO, is our other partner. It’s called Global Fishing Watch. And your listeners can go to .