Kim, H., Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance otherwise uniqueness, equilibrium or conformity? A social data. Record out of Personality and you will Social Mindset, 77, 785–800.
Kray, L. J., Reb, J., Galinsky, A great. D., Thompson, L. (2004). Label reactance during the bargaining desk: The effect from label activation and you will power into the claiming and you can performing value. Identification and Social Mindset Bulletin, 29, 399–411.
Gender Jobs, 31, 109–119;
Pennebaker, J. W., Sanders, D. Y. (1976). American graffiti: Effects of power and you will reactance stimulation. Personality and you will Personal Psychology Bulletin, dos, 264–267.
Porter, N., Geis, F. L., Cooper, Elizabeth., Newman, Elizabeth. (1985). Androgyny and leaders from inside the mixed-gender organizations. Log out of Character and you may Public Mindset, 44, 808–823.
Rudman, L. A., Glick, P. (1999). Feminized administration and you will backlash on agentic female: New undetectable will set you back to help you women of an excellent kinder, softer picture of center-executives. Diary off Personality and you may Personal Mindset, 77, 1004–1010.
Shoham, V., Trost, S. Age., Rohrb). Away from state so you’re able to attribute and rear: Reactance idea goes medical. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Snyder, C. Roentgen., Fromkin, H. L. (1977). Problem as the a positive trait: The development and you will recognition out-of a level measuring significance of uniqueness. Record of Irregular Mindset, 86(5), 518–527.
Terry, D., Hogg, Yards. (1996). Classification norms together with feelings-conclusion relationships: A task to possess group personality. Character and you may Personal Therapy Bulletin, twenty-two, 776–793.
Visser, P. S., Krosnick, J. Good. (1998). The development of ideas electricity across the lifestyle cycle: Surge and you can decline. Log out of Identification and Personal Mindset, 75, 1389–1410.
Behavioral looks plus the influence of women for the mixed-sex communities
Wolf, S., Montgomery, D. A good. (1977). Ramifications of inadmissible facts and you may number of judicial admonishment to ignore on judgments off mock jurors. Diary out of Applied Social Therapy, eight, 205–219.
The brand new seen intercourse differences in conformity possess public causes-namely that women try socialized become even more caring in regards to the wants from other people-however, there are even evolutionary explanations. Men is very likely to overcome conformity to show in order to ladies who they are a good mates. Griskevicius, Goldstein, Mortensen, Cialdini, and you can Kenrick (2006) learned that people, however female, who had been primed that have view regarding intimate and you may sexual destination was basically less likely to want to conform to the brand new views regarding others with the a consequent task than just was indeed boys that has perhaps not become primed to take into consideration intimate attraction.
One way that women is reply to it “double-bind” in which they must undertake masculine functions to advance, however if they are doing they aren’t preferred, is to try to embrace even more feminine leaders looks, where they normally use a great deal more interpersonally situated behavior such as for example agreeing with others, pretending from inside the a friendly styles, and you can guaranteeing subordinates to participate the selection-to make processes (Eagly Johnson, 1990; Eagly mais aussi al tinychat., 1992; Timber, 1987). In short, women can be very likely to undertake a good transformational leaders build than is actually people-doing this lets them to to work leaders whilst not pretending from inside the an exceedingly male method (Eagly Carli, 2007; Eagly, Johannesen-Schmidt, van Egen, 2003).
When individuals feel that their independence is endangered of the influence effort yet they also have the capability to combat that salesmanship, they may experience psychological reactance, a strong inspirational state that resists public determine (Brehm, 1966; Miron Brehm, 2006). Reactance is actually naughty whenever our capability to decide which behaviors to help you take part in was eliminated otherwise threatened which have removal. The results of the exposure to reactance would be the fact anyone can get not stick or obey whatsoever and might flow their viewpoints otherwise behavior out of the desires of influencer.
Jetten, J., Spears, Roentgen., Manstead, A good. S. Roentgen. (1997). Electricity off personality and you can intergroup distinction: Brand new determine out of classification norms. Eu Diary from Personal Psychology, 27, 603–609;